Labor Market, Automation, Workforce, ARK Research, Labor market friction

The Steep Cost of Labor Market Friction: $630 Billion

Friction in the labor market costs the U.S economy more than $630B per annum as shown in the chart below. Given ARK’s expectations for an acceleration in job turnover thanks to automation, this number should be expected to grow. Bad news? Not for everyone: these frictions present tremendous opportunity for companies that help firms reduce time-to-hire, provide workers with new skill-sets, and train new employees more efficiently. Though automation, robotics, and 3D printing tend to take center stage in industrial innovation, employee education and training is an equally important and often overlooked opportunity.

Labor Market, Automation, Workforce, ARK Research, Labor market friction

The largest cost associated with friction in the labor market is regular employee turnover. Firings, resignations, and retirements will account for 58 million separations this year.1 Given a total of only 142 million non-farm employees in the economy,2 separations impact 40% of all jobs every year.

ARK calculates that recruiting costs alone will account for more than $240B of spending in 2015. Finding and wooing attractive candidates for open positions is expensive, at roughly $4,000 per hire.3 These expenses include the use of external tools, the costs of internal resources devoted to assessing potential candidates, and the onboarding costs of bringing on a new employee.

Despite the high cost of recruiting, companies can’t leave positions vacant: unfilled job-slots cost firms roughly $70 billion a year. The explanation is simple: when a position remains unfilled, existing employees have to put in overtime, or temporary staff has to be brought on board, and both options are expensive. All-in, it takes an average of two months to fill a position.4

The second biggest cost arising from labor market friction occurs after the employee has been hired. It takes roughly five months before an employee reaches 100% productivity5 and, in total, companies devote vast resources bringing new employees up to speed. In addition, companies lose output during the training process itself.

Training employees costs roughly $230B per year by ARK’s estimates. More than two thirds of the cost, or $170B, is on direct training materials and courses, a disproportionate amount of which is devoted to new hires.6 Moreover, as routine jobs become automated, more highly skilled jobs are created and require additional training. Consequently, as the chart below shows, spending on training has increased steadily since 2010. In addition to the direct cost of training, new hires impose an indirect burden, as they require additional time and attention from co-workers and supervisors.

Labor Market, Automation, Workforce, ARK Research, Labor market friction

In addition to the costs of training, ARK calculates a total loss of $49B in output while new employees ramp toward full productivity. As automation increases worker productivity ARK expects revenue per employee to double over 20 years. This will drive the opportunity cost of unfilled and underperformed jobs even higher.

The third largest cost of labor market turnover comes from corporate unemployment insurance payments. During the year ended June, 2015, unemployment insurance payments totaled $45 billion. Administrators seek to build reserves during upcycles to cover the cost of down-cycles, so collections and distributions typically do not match. At its peak in 2009, the unemployment insurance program paid out more than $75B.7 Today, with the unemployment rate at a cyclical low of 5.0%, payouts still are running $35 billion on a trailing 12-month basis. The size of the fund required and the time during which job seekers rely upon unemployment payments could be decreased by companies that can effectively match talent to unfilled position and by companies that can train unqualified candidates to an acceptable level.

While ARK’s research shows that automation won’t lead to rampant unemployment8, it will fuel the underlying drivers of friction in the labor market by increasing job turnover and employee training requirements. As seen in the chart below, ARK expects automation to account for an additional 300,000 separations in 2020, 2.5 million separations in 2025, and as many as 8 million in 2030. The increase in employee turnover could cost the economy an additional $3B in 2020 alone and as much as $80B per annum by 2030.

Labor Market, Automation, Workforce, ARK Research, Labor market friction

Of course, ARK doesn’t expect to see the cost burden grow so large. As automation continues to create new positions and increases employee turnover, there will be a growing opportunity for companies like Cornerstone OnDemandCSOD, ManpowerGroupMAN, AdeccoAHEXY, WorkdayWDAY, Robert Half InternationalRHI, Randstad HoldingRANJY and LinkedInLNKD, to drive substantial efficiency into the market. Literally hundreds of billions of dollars in productivity potential depends upon their ability to do so.

  1.  Bureau of Labor Statistics JOLTS Report November 2015
  2.  Bureau of Labor Statistics Current Employment Statistics
  3.  Bersin by Deloitte, Talent Acquisition Factbook 2015
  4.  Deloitte, The Skills Gap in U.S. Manufacturing 2015 and Beyond
  5.  MIT Sloan Management Review, Getting New Hires Up to Speed Quickly
  6.  Association for Talent Development, 2014 State of the Industry Report
  7.  United States Department of Labor
  8. ARK Investment Management’s thematic research actually shows that automation will increase the total number of available jobs.


ARK's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. For a list of all purchases and sales made by ARK for client accounts during the past year that could be considered by the SEC as recommendations, click here. It should not be assumed that recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of the securities in this list. For full disclosures, click here.