According to ARK’s research, industrial robot1 costs will drop by roughly 65%, to levels much lower than most analysts now anticipate, by 2025. Combined with advances in machine learning and computer vision, this drop in costs should cause an inflection point in the demand for robots as they infiltrate new industries with more provocative use cases.
ARK anticipates that industrial robots will cost less than $11,000 per unit, much less than the Boston Consulting Group’s (BCG’s) expectation of $24,000, by 2025, as shown above.2 Fundamental to our analysis is Wright’s Law: that is, for every cumulative doubling in number of units produced, costs will decline by a consistent percentage.3 In the robotics space, that cost decline – known as the learning rate – has been roughly 50%. Based on historical production and pricing data, ARK’s application of Wright’s Law suggests that BCG’s expectations are far too conservative.
While BCG4 anticipates that the historical price trajectory of robots will diminish and stall in response to underlying material costs, it fails to anticipate and incorporate innovations evolving in manufacturing. 3D printing, for example, should reduce the use and weight of materials dramatically, up to 75%, without diminishing performance.
The history of publicly traded robotics companies suggests that the industry has benefited significantly from manufacturing efficiency gains. As shown below, while robot prices have dropped by 40% during the past decade, the industry’s gross margins have been stable to improving. During the next few years, this margin structure is unlikely to change significantly.
As robots have become cheaper and easier not only to train but also to integrate into traditional production processes, growth in the demand for industrial robots has accelerated in two stages since 2000, as shown below. Prior to 2000, lower prices would shrink the total industrial robot market. Today, topline growth accelerates in response to declining costs.
While ARK’s forecast for industrial robot sales is based on the price elasticity of demand during this decade, continued increases in the capability of robots – perhaps inspired by artificial intelligence – could boost sales beyond the forecast presented in the chart below.
Important to note, ARK has based its forecast of cost declines only on the price of industrial robots, without regard to improvements in their performance. As machine learning and new sensing capabilities impact them, not only will their performance improve but other costs associated with installation and integration should fall as well. For example, they will require little or no human programming and will be able to roam freely instead of being trapped in safety cages and by other barriers. As a result, ARK anticipates the industrial robot market will hit many other tipping points, surprising on the high side of expectations, perhaps dramatically, during the next few decades.
- ARK is referring to industrial robots as defined by ISO 8373:2012: An automatically controlled, reprogrammable, multipurpose manipulator programmable in three or more axes, which can be either fixed in place or mobile for use in industrial automation applications. https://ifr.org/img/office/Industrial_Robots_2016_Chapter_1_2.pdf ↩
- Constant 2015 dollar ↩
- http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/at-work/test-and-measurement/wrights-law-edges-out-moores-law-in-predicting-technology-development ↩
- https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/lean-manufacturing-innovation-robots-redefine-competitiveness/ ↩
The information provided is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation to buy or sell any securities mentioned. It is intended only to provide observations and views of the author(s) at the time of writing, both of which are subject to change at any time without prior notice. Certain of the statements contained herein are statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on ARK's current views and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Equities may decline in value due to both real and perceived general market, economic, and industry conditions. For a list of all purchases and sales made by ARK for client accounts during the past year that could be considered by the SEC as recommendations, click here. It should not be assumed that recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of the securities in this list. For full disclosures, click here.